LC 00747: verschil tussen versies
(Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je - als in een logboek - hoe je jouw '''project of onderzoek''' hebt '''aangepakt''' (wat en wanneer je dat met wie hebt gedaan).'' ''N...') |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
(2 tussenliggende versies door dezelfde gebruiker niet weergegeven) | |||
Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
== Start == | |||
== Plan and Design == | |||
== Execution == | |||
== | === Target Response === | ||
The target response for testing the toolkit in both villages was set at at least three key figures per community. This target was easily reached within the community of Rilland, but this was more difficult for the community of Yerseke. Only one of the targeted key figures was willing to participate. Reasons for not participating in the interview were not having or wanting to invest the required time, or the respondent did not felt acquainted with the presented subjects (see p.31 and p.36 for more detail). | |||
To tackle these problems it could be possible to make sure that the agenda of the stakeholders/participants is linked to agenda of the research. By doing this the willingness to invest time in the interview is likely to increase. Another option to spark the attention of the participants is to select a more recent/actual topic. This could again possible increase the willingness to invest time. | |||
=== | == Evaluation == | ||
{{Light Context | {{Light Context | ||
|Supercontext=PR 00143 | |Supercontext=PR 00143 | ||
Regel 50: | Regel 19: | ||
|Sequence number=1 | |Sequence number=1 | ||
|Context type=Situation | |Context type=Situation | ||
|Heading=Thesis research Izhar van Eenennaam - | |Heading=Thesis research Izhar van Eenennaam - approach | ||
|Show referred by=Nee | |Show referred by=Nee | ||
}} | }} |
Huidige versie van 23 jun 2017 om 10:32
Start
Plan and Design
Execution
Target Response
The target response for testing the toolkit in both villages was set at at least three key figures per community. This target was easily reached within the community of Rilland, but this was more difficult for the community of Yerseke. Only one of the targeted key figures was willing to participate. Reasons for not participating in the interview were not having or wanting to invest the required time, or the respondent did not felt acquainted with the presented subjects (see p.31 and p.36 for more detail).
To tackle these problems it could be possible to make sure that the agenda of the stakeholders/participants is linked to agenda of the research. By doing this the willingness to invest time in the interview is likely to increase. Another option to spark the attention of the participants is to select a more recent/actual topic. This could again possible increase the willingness to invest time.
Evaluation