LC 00458: verschil tussen versies

Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Regel 2: Regel 2:


Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (''Es gibt Systeme''). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a reoccurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance Giddens (cite{})). But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.
Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (''Es gibt Systeme''). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a reoccurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance Giddens (cite{})). But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.
<accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>
 
{{LC Book config}}
{{LC Book config}}
{{Light Context
{{Light Context
Regel 12: Regel 12:
|Context type=Situation
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Social Theory of Luhmann
|Heading=Social Theory of Luhmann
|Show referred by=Nee
|Show edit button=Ja
|Show edit button=Ja
|Show VE button=Ja
|Show VE button=Ja
Regel 18: Regel 19:
}}
}}
{{LC Book additional
{{LC Book additional
|Preparatory reading=
|Preparatory reading=LC 00457,
|Continue reading=
|Continue reading=LC 00500,
}}
}}<accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>

Versie van 12 jun 2020 21:38

Niklas Luhmann was one of the most important social scientist of the 20th century. He was a very prolific writer and published numerous articles and books, which makes it hard to do justice to his many contributions. The book Social Systems (Soziale Systeme, Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie) is regarded as his magnum opus. Readers interested in Luhmann are referred to (Niklas Luhmann, Christian Borch, Routeledge, 2011) for a concise and gentle introduction. This is a good starting point to dig deeper in one of Luhmann’s more accessible works: Introduction on Systems Theory (Niklas Luhmann, Polity, 1st ed., December10, 2012).

Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (Es gibt Systeme). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a reoccurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance Giddens (cite{})). But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.























Referenties



Dit is een beveiligde pagina.