LC 00458: verschil tussen versies

Versie van 3 jul 2020 08:31

Niklas Luhmann was one of the most important social scientist of the 20^th century. He was a very prolific writer and published numerous articles and books, which makes it hard to do justice to his many contributions. The book Social Systems (Soziale Systeme, Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie) (Niklas Luhmann, 1 januari 1995) is regarded as his magnum opus. Readers interested in Luhmann are referred to Niklas Luhmann (Christian Borch, 1 januari 2011) for a concise and gentle introduction. This is a good starting point to dig deeper in one of Luhmann’s more accessible works: Introduction to Systems Theory (Niklas Luhmann, 10 december 2012).

Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (Es gibt Systeme). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a recurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance Giddens (Anthony Giddens, 1 januari 1984). But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.

Dit is een beveiligde pagina.

Lees hiervoor:
Critical Systems Thinking
Lees hierna:
The Autopoietic Turn

Referenties

The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Anthony Giddens, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1 januari 1984.
Niklas Luhmann, Christian Borch, Routeledge, 1 januari 2011.
Introduction to Systems Theory, Niklas Luhmann, Polity, 1st ed., 10 december 2012.
Social Systems, Niklas Luhmann, Stanford University Press, 1 januari 1995.

@@ Regel 1: / Regel 1: @@
 Niklas Luhmann was one of the most important social scientist of the 20<sup>th</sup> century. He was a very prolific writer and published numerous articles and books, which makes it hard to do justice to his many contributions. The book {{Cite|resource=Resource Bibliographic Reference 00042|name=Social Systems (Soziale Systeme, Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie)|dialog=process-bibliographicreference-dialog}} is regarded as his magnum opus. Readers interested in Luhmann are referred to {{Cite|resource=Resource Bibliographic Reference 00043|name=Niklas Luhmann|dialog=process-bibliographicreference-dialog}} for a concise and gentle introduction. This is a good starting point to dig deeper in one of Luhmann’s more accessible works: {{Cite|resource=Resource Bibliographic Reference 00044|name=Introduction to Systems Theory|dialog=process-bibliographicreference-dialog}}.
-Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (''Es gibt Systeme''). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a reccurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance {{Cite|resource=Resource Bibliographic Reference 00045|name=Giddens|dialog=process-bibliographicreference-dialog}}. But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.
+Social Systems starts with the statement: there are systems (''Es gibt Systeme''). This is a bold statement, and not everyone agrees. In Social Systems, he took the autopoietic turn by applying Muturama’s and Varela’s conception of living organisms as self-producing systems. However, they argued that living organisms have a clearly defined boundaries, which cannot necessarily be said of social systems. There is a recurring pattern in Luhmann’s research. He took often ideas from others and stretched them to fit his own needs. With a less strict interpretation of self-production, it can be argued that the underlying structure of a society (e.g., rules, resources, positions, and practices) make human activity possible, and the other way round, human activities shape the underlying structure (see for instance {{Cite|resource=Resource Bibliographic Reference 00045|name=Giddens|dialog=process-bibliographicreference-dialog}}. But we won’t split hairs here whether self-producing social systems exist in a pure form or not. The point is that Luhmann provides an encompassing theory of social systems that can be used to think deeply about the nature of societies irrespective of whether social systems really exist or not.
 <accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>
 {{LC Book config}}