LC 00571: verschil tussen versies

Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Regel 1: Regel 1:
The key notion here is that the quality of a transformation performed by an activity Q is determined by its facilitation expressed in the form of environmental conditions. The conditions may have a positive effect as well as a negative effect on the transformation. Better facilitation leads to better results, and the same holds for the opposite. In any case, a change in conditions means a change in the system in which Q is contained without changing the reason of being (P-R).
In practice, this usually means that if more resources are allocated for a system, the better a system can perform. For instance, a school might invest in more teachers resulting in smaller class sizes eventually leading to a higher quality of education. On the other hand, if less resources are available, this might have the negative effect that the quality of education is reduced to an extent that new student registration are lagging behind. This is a reinforcing, downward-oriented loop. In the end, the school has to close its doors because its reason of being – educating students – disappeared due to lack of students.
The “same Q – same P-R” pattern is akin to the hard systems approach of Systems Dynamics (SD). Think of conditions as variables and regard activities and goals as given but not required for modeling purposes, the resulting network of conditions then resembles a SD model. So, SD kind of modeling is implicitly supported within EM<sub>ont</sub>. Even SD stocks and flows can be modeled in EM<sub>ont</sub>. Recall that the EM<sub>ont</sub> element Outcome is used as a means to explicate what is being produced or consumed by an activity. By refining the Outcome element and the produces and consumes relations by semantic web principles, they can be turned into a SD stock and flow construct. A computational model for EM<sub>ont</sub> is given in … that shows how EM<sub>ont</sub> models can be executed.
[[Bestand:Same Q – same P-R.png|gecentreerd|miniatuur|624x624px|'''Figure:''' “same Q – same P-R” pattern.]]
<accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>
{{LC Book config}}
{{LC Book config}}
{{Light Context
{{Light Context
Regel 12: Regel 19:
|Show title=Ja
|Show title=Ja
|EMM access control=Access:We got to move,
|EMM access control=Access:We got to move,
}}<accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>
}}
{{LC Book additional
{{LC Book additional
|Preparatory reading=
|Preparatory reading=
|Continue reading=
|Continue reading=
}}
}}

Versie van 29 mei 2020 10:35

The key notion here is that the quality of a transformation performed by an activity Q is determined by its facilitation expressed in the form of environmental conditions. The conditions may have a positive effect as well as a negative effect on the transformation. Better facilitation leads to better results, and the same holds for the opposite. In any case, a change in conditions means a change in the system in which Q is contained without changing the reason of being (P-R).

In practice, this usually means that if more resources are allocated for a system, the better a system can perform. For instance, a school might invest in more teachers resulting in smaller class sizes eventually leading to a higher quality of education. On the other hand, if less resources are available, this might have the negative effect that the quality of education is reduced to an extent that new student registration are lagging behind. This is a reinforcing, downward-oriented loop. In the end, the school has to close its doors because its reason of being – educating students – disappeared due to lack of students.

The “same Q – same P-R” pattern is akin to the hard systems approach of Systems Dynamics (SD). Think of conditions as variables and regard activities and goals as given but not required for modeling purposes, the resulting network of conditions then resembles a SD model. So, SD kind of modeling is implicitly supported within EMont. Even SD stocks and flows can be modeled in EMont. Recall that the EMont element Outcome is used as a means to explicate what is being produced or consumed by an activity. By refining the Outcome element and the produces and consumes relations by semantic web principles, they can be turned into a SD stock and flow construct. A computational model for EMont is given in … that shows how EMont models can be executed.

Figure: “same Q – same P-R” pattern.

Dit is een beveiligde pagina.